Some rumors may even seem positive, such as promotions, engagements or prizes. But until proven otherwise, they are just that: rumors. Gossip is when you take rumors (that unconfirmed data) and transmit them, spreading what may be “fake news”. Gossip and rumors can alienate friends, ruin reputation, and even lead to ostracizing behavior and other forms of relational aggression.
Gossip can also be detrimental to those who participate in it, but it is not necessarily the target. People who constantly spread negative information about others can damage their own reputation by stating that they are unreliable and can become the next target of any rumor or gossip. Gossip can also make a person seem critical and insecure. Besides, gossip isn't really useful.
If a person has a conflict with another person, it is much more effective to address it assertively than to address it by spreading hurtful rumors about the other person. It's malicious, it's meant to maim and it's a form of murder. People with a power agenda often gossip to ruin anyone they think won't do what they say. There is not enough campaign against it in the churches, because the people of the church like it.
I have been a victim of these campaigns for no other reason than hatred, of which the human race has a good amount. And I don't mean hurting someone as in “making them cry but hurting someone as in “causing emotional and mental distress that leads to depression and suicidal thoughts. Gossip can cause irreversible damage if gossip is bad enough. Besides, whatever you're gossiping about could be a very sensitive and personal topic for someone who doesn't want to be publicly announced.
Help us improve your experience by providing feedback on this page. Allport and Postman called their most far-reaching assertion the basic law of rumor. He stated that the strength of the rumor (R) will vary with the importance of the subject to the individual in question (i) times the ambiguity of the evidence related to the subject in question (a), or R ≈ i × a. The basic law of rumor was not empirically based on any rumor research, but was adapted from the earlier work of Douglas McGregor (193) on factors influencing predictive judgments (Rosnow, 1980).
One difficulty with the basic law of rumor was that the importance factor was elusive and not easy for researchers to put into practice. It was also worrying that the basic law of rumor ignored the emotional context of rumor. Based on the findings of subsequent research, Rosnow (1991, 200) proposed a modified theory in which rumor is seen as an attempt to deal with anxieties and uncertainties by generating and passing stories and assumptions that can explain things, address anxieties, and provide justification for behavior. At the molar level, we can generally distinguish between two types of rumors (Rosnow, Yost, 26 Esposito, 198), those that invoke the expected consequences (rumors of desires) and those that invoke feared or disappointing consequences (rumors of terror), but finer distinctions have also been described within each category (e.g.
Another appendix is that people tend to spread rumors that they perceive as believable (even the most ridiculous stories), although when anxieties are intense, those who spread rumors are less likely to control the logic or plausibility of what they convey to others (Rosnow, 200. These changes in the classic view of rumor have implications for how potentially harmful rumors can be effectively combated (DiFonzo, Bordia, %26 Rosnow, 1994; Fine %26 Turner, 2001; Kimmel, 200) and have recently served as a springboard for the innovative work of other researchers. For example, Chip Heath, Chris Bell, and Emily Sternberg (200) have been exploring how rumors and urban legends similarly thrive in the selection of information and emotions. They have developed the thesis that rumors and urban legends are subsets of what biologist Richard Dawkins (197) called memes, reasoning that there is a cultural analogy between ideas that compete for survival and biological genes.
DiFonzo, N. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 47-62 Thank you for letting us know that this page. Some people spread rumors as a way to intimidate others and gain status or popularity. But spreading rumors as a way to turn people against someone is a form of intimidation and can have serious consequences for the person who does it.
For example, at school, there could be rumors about casting calls in the theater department, about how the final will be handled in history class, or that the head cheerleader is secretly dating a member of the chess club. Studies by his group have shown that the most generous and moral among us are more likely to spread rumors about people who are not trusted, and report that they do so because they are concerned about helping others. To help your child deal effectively with gossip and rumors, it's important to understand the difference between the two. But most children gossip or spread rumors to fit in with their friends, as a way to feel special or to impress others.
Although it can be difficult, you can deal with rumors by not taking them personally, as many people spread rumors just to see someone get angry. While rumor dynamics were traditionally studied using a one-way communication paradigm similar to the telephone game, these researchers have studied it in rumor discussion groups (Bordia, 1996; Bordia %26 DiFonzo, 2004; Bordia, DiFonzo, %26 Chang, 1999; Bordia %26 Rosnow, 199, for example, a talk discussion group of a rumor in cyberspace over a period of 6 days. More than rumors, gossip tends to have an inner circle about it, as it is routinely transmitted between people who have a common history or shared interests. .